I’m all in favour of a debate and I welcome hearing and reading opinions that differ from my own; it helps me to challenge my existing beliefs, learn, develop and avoid getting stuck. What I didn’t welcome was the publication in the March issue of the three letters in response to ‘Putting gender on the agenda’ (News feature, December 2017).
The letter from Transgender Trend argues that contributors to the news article, of which I was one, ‘have no idea of youth culture’ – I beg to differ – and that ‘trans’ has become the highest-status identity’. Transgender is not about status and is not an identity choice any more than cisgender is. My extensive experience of working with ‘youth culture’ over the past two decades illustrates that transgender young people put up with a lot of ignorance and hate – no-one would choose that. The letter goes on to name and quote me as saying that parents who have had a son for 15 years and now have a daughter can find it mind-blowing. What I also said was that ‘I do my best to acknowledge how difficult it can be for them to support their child while managing their own feelings of confusion and loss.’ Transgender Trend does the opposite: their raison d’etre is to campaign against supporting gender diversity in young people. The letter, and our organisation, failed to mention that.
The letter has been removed from BACP’s website but the proverbial horse has bolted all over social media. The vast majority of comments on Twitter rallied against BACP for their apology rather than Transgender Trend for voicing their non-affirmative stance. Tweeters shared ignorant and anti-trans opinion, contrary to our code of ethics and the MoU. Many were BACP members working with CYP who must have felt vindicated in their prejudicial views following the publication in their professional journal of anti-trans propaganda. I worry for young people seeking support, as it is evidently a lottery as to which side of the ethical/affirmative fence their counsellor resides.
Another of the letters was written by a BPC/UKCP member who shares the position and values of Transgender Trend. He has re-tweeted both letters repeatedly arguing that they contain ‘irrefutable truths’. On the contrary. His letter states that ‘Self-identification as trans may seem to offer a magical solution to’ … ‘issues related to emerging sexuality, family break-up, social isolation, autistic traits, self-harming and/or traumatic memories’. Really – a magical solution? I find it deeply concerning that a registered psychotherapist holds such a viewpoint. The letter also states, erroneously, but as if it were fact, that ‘medicalisation with hormones and surgery [is the] default treatment’. Any transgender person who has decided to transition (and many do not) will tell you that the long road to transition is paved with assessments, therapy and questions. It concerns me that BACP have failed to remove and apologise for this contribution as they did the other. Yet the writers of both share the same non-affirmative stance and say they specialise in offering therapy to young people who identify as transgender and training to those who work with them.
The only letter from a bona fide member of BACP makes some valid points. I agree; it is not ok to compare a young person identifying as transgender – a reality – to one identifying as a panda – a fantasy. However, she goes on to state: ‘The Tavistock takes a controversial and extremely conservative line’ [in]‘…never’ giving up hope that the […] trans person in front of you might not actually be trans’. This is not my experience of supporting young people with community-based psychotherapy alongside their treatment from Gender Identity Development Services (GIDS) and nor is it theirs.
I don’t know why Therapy Today decided to publish two anti-trans letters from non-BACP members. I accept that letters are published with a disclaimer that they contain the views of the author, not the organisation, but we’re talking about a code of ethics here, not merely a difference of opinion. My hope is that BACP will take better care of us and our clients in the future, regardless of gender.
Jeanine Connor (MBACP)